This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Goertzel, T. Articles by Goertzel, B. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Capital Punishment and Homicide Rates: Sociological Realities and Econometric Distortions

Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA

Benjamin Goertzel

Novamonte, LLC, Maryland, USA, ben{at}goertzel.org

Sociological methods have consistently succeeded while econometric methods have failed in research on capital punishment and homicide. But econometricians aggressively promote their findings in public policy venues, while sociologists are less assertive. This is due to cultural differences between the disciplines, and to a philosophy of science that values falsification of hypotheses over progress in answering research questions. This problem has occurred and is likely to reoccur in other policy areas where sociologists are insufficiently assertive in defending their accomplishments.

Key Words: capital punishment • causal analysis • death penalty • econometrics • sociological methodology

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?