This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Emery, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Class and Race Domination and Transformation in South Africa

Cal State Fullerton, California, USA, aemery{at}fullerton.edu

South African neo-Marxist scholarship gave class analytic primacy in explaining both material inequality and race domination. I review neo-Marxist theories of class and race domination and transformation and find class necessary but secondary to race in explaining the emergence and demise of the racial order. Specifically, classes created a racialized labor repressive system. More recently, working classes have struggled for social democracy. But class theories inadequately explain the comprehensiveness and resilience of race domination. This ensued from ethnic mobilizations to create a white ethnocracy and cleanse South Africa of other ethnic groups. The apartheid era systematized ethnic cleansing, but cleansing was limited by whites' dependence on cheap black labor. Thus racialized capitalist growth favored white social mobility and black proletarianization. The primacy of race over class is also indicated by the anti-apartheid movements' historic demands for inclusive nationalism and the new regimes' search for justice through policies of deracialization.

Key Words: class • deracialization • domination • race • social democracy • transformation

Critical Sociology, Vol. 34, No. 3, 409-431 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0896920507088166


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?